BookDaily

People's History of the United States: 1492 to Present

People's History of the United States: 1492 to Present


Are you an AUTHOR? Click here to include your books on BookDaily.com

Chapter One

Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress

Arawak men and women, naked, tawny, and full of wonder, emerged from their villages onto the island's beaches and swam out to get a closer look at the strange big boat. When Columbus and his sailors came ashore, carrying swords, speaking oddly, the Arawaks ran to greet them, brought them food, water, gifts. He later wrote of this in his log:

They . . . brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks' bells, They willingly traded everything they owned . . . They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features . . . They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of cane . . . They would make fine servants . . . With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.

These Arawaks of the Bahama Islands were much like Indians on the mainland, who were remarkable (European observers were to say again and again) for their hospitality, their belief in sharing. These traits did not stand out in the Europe of the Renaissance, dominated as it was by the religion of popes, the government of kings, the frenzy for money that marked Western civilization and its first messenger to the Americas, Christopher Columbus.

Columbus wrote: As soon as I arrived in the Indies, on the first Island which I found, I took some of the natives by force in order that they might learn and might give me information of whatever there is in these parts.

The information that Columbus wanted most was: Where is the gold? He had persuaded the king and queen of Spain to finance an expedition to the lands, the wealth, he expected would be on the other side of the Atlantic--the Indies and Asia, gold and spices. For, like other informed people of his time, he knew the world was round and he could sail west in order to get to the Far East.

Spain was recently unified, one of the new modem nation-states, like France, England, and Portugal. Its population, mostly poor peasants, worked for the nobility, who were 2 percent of the population and owned 95 percent of the land. Spain had tied itself to the, Catholic Church, expelled all the Jews, driven out the Moors. Like other states of the modem world, Spain sought gold, which was becoming the new mark of wealth, more useful than land because it could buy anything.

There was gold in Asia, it was thought, and certainly silks and spices, for Marco Polo and others had brought back marvelous things from their overland expeditions centuries before. Now that the Turks had conquered Constantinople and the eastern Mediterranean, and controlled the land routes to Asia, a sea route was needed. Portuguese sailors were working their way around the southern tip of Africa. Spain decided to gamble on a long sail across an unknown ocean.

In return for bringing back gold and spices, they promised Columbus 10 percent of the profits, governorship over new-found lands, and the fame that would go with a new title: Admiral of the Ocean Sea. He was a merchant's clerk from the Italian city of Genoa, part-time weaver (the son of a skilled weaver), and expert sailor. He set out with three sailing ships, the largest of which was the Santa Maria, perhaps 100 feet long, and thirty-nine crew members.

Columbus would never have made it to Asia, which was thousands of miles farther away than he had calculated, imagining a smaller world. He would have been doomed by that great expanse of sea. But he was lucky. One-fourth of the way there he came upon an unknown, uncharted land that lay between Europe and Asia--the Americas. It was early October 1492, and thirty-three days since he and his crew had left the Canary Islands, off the Atlantic coast of Africa. Now they saw branches and sticks floating in the water. They saw flocks of birds. These were signs of land. Then, on October 12, a sailor called Rodrigo saw the early morning moon shining on white sands, and cried out. It was an island in the Bahamas, the Caribbean sea. The first man to sight land was supposed to get a yearly pension of 10,000 maravedis for life, but Rodrigo never got it. Columbus claimed he had seen a light the evening before. He got the reward.

So, approaching land, they were met by the Arawak Indians, who swam out to greet them. The Arawaks lived in village communes, had a developed agriculture of corn, yams, cassava. They could spin and weave, but they had no horses or work animals. They had no iron, but they wore tiny gold ornaments in their ears.

This was to have enormous consequences: it led Columbus to take some of them aboard ship as prisoners because he insisted that they guide him to the source of the gold. He then sailed to what is now Cuba, then to Hispaniola (the island which today consists of Haiti and the Dominican Republic). There, bits of visible gold in the rivers, and a gold mask presented to Columbus by a local Indian chief, led to wild visions of gold fields.

On Hispaniola, out of timbers from the Santa Maria, which had run aground, Columbus built a fort, the first European military base in the Western Hemisphere. He called it Navidad (Christmas) and left thirty-nine crewmembers there, with instructions to find and store the gold. He took more Indian prisoners and put them aboard his two remaining ships. At one part of the island he got into a fight with Indians who refused to trade as many bows and arrows as he and his men wanted. Two were run through with swords and bled to death. Then the Nina and the Pinta set sail for the Azores and Spain. When the weather turned cold, the Indian prisoners began to die...

(Continues...)

Excerpted from "A People's History of the United States" by Howard Zinn. Copyright (C) 2005 by Howard Zinn. Excerpted by permission. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher. Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

BookDaily User Reviews

Be the first to review this book.
Please login or create an account to review this book.

Amazon User Reviews

Excelent


Mar/10/2010
As soon as I received my book I had to use it, and I must say it's been more than I expected, the reading is easy and understandable for a non native speaker like me. Professor Zinn shows history from the point of view of the "nobodies", the forgotten ones, which gives the reader a wider view of the real history of the United States, not everything is "freedom" and "democracy" my friends... I am sure I am going to enjoy this book a lot!
by Wilhelm (Mexico City, Mexico)

Peoples History of the US


Mar/09/2010
Wonderful book, arrived in perfect condition, imparts the truth about our history, which we never learned in school.
by Marcia Laris (palo alto, ca)

Informative Book


Mar/09/2010
This book presents a history of the United States that is not taught in schools or universities. It provides a history of our country from the views and experiences of regular people, such as blacks, women, and laborers.
by Rock Chick (New York, NY)

History as it should be taught.


Mar/06/2010
This should be required reading for all High School US History students. Gives a whole new look at what is being taught or isn't being taught today...
by R. C. PLEGER (Mulegé, Baja California Sur)

A Different Angle


Mar/06/2010
Howard Zinn died a few weeks ago, and on NPR, David Horowitz was asked to comment on his death. I have never heard less charitable comments about the recently deceased. Curiosity piqued, I googled "Howard Zinn" "David Horowitz" and found links to David Horowitz' website where I found words about Zinn that made Horowitz' comments to NPR seem very measured indeed. Since I consider Horowitz to be a knee-jerk conservative fanatic, I thought, "Wow, Zinn must be pretty good stuff!"

So I purchased A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES, I have just finished reading it, and now I can recommend it. Zinn is up front about his bias in the book's introduction. On his website, David Horowitz accused Zinn of being a Stalinist, which is preposterous, but Zinn would proudly label himself a socialist. However, Zinn means it with a degree of ideological purity not to be found in this world. It is the dream of a pure socialist society that Zinn unabashedly longs for (a society, I might add, that would embody more truly Christian values than we find today in this, our "Christian nation", as some call it), and he wastes no time pointing out that the U.S.A. has never approached his ideal. Zinn makes no bones of his distaste for capitalism.

I am not a socialist, and I disagree with much of Zinn's philosopy; why would I recommend such a biased book? I recommend it because, as Zinn points out at the beginning, all accounts of history are biased, and this account has the virtue of not being the whitewashed, sanitized version we all learned in public school. This is not a comfortable book to read if you are a privileged white male. It is not a happy book for any reader, but the course of history hasn't been particularly happy. This book will not make you proud to be an American. Many times I found myself saying, "But, wait, we're not as bad as..." However, Zinn's aim isn't to compare America to other countries; it is to describe us as we are and as we have been. Yes, from a point of view with a decided bias, but a point of view that has merit and is worth considering.

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES was first published in 1980, and the original chapters are the strongest. The final version published before his death continues the history through the events of 9/11/2001, but some of the later chapters don't seem to be quite as cogent; at times, Zinn seems to have to strain to make his point. And small factual errors creep in; he describes an anti-nuclear protest in 1999 taking place at the Trident submarine base in Bangor, Maine.

If you are going to read only one book on American history, should it be A PEOPLE'S HISTORY? No. And that's the point. If you are going to read only one book on American history, save yourself the trouble and read Danielle Steele or Tom Clancy instead. A balanced view of history requires more than one point of view, but too often the only point of view we get is the orthodoxy. Read lots of books of American history, but if you plan to read only a handful, then A People's History of the United States should be one of them.
by Peter B. Stewart (Redmond, WA USA)

Washington Post Reviews