When Poop Goes
It all began in realspace, on a subway train in South Korea. A young
woman's small dog pooped in the train. Other passengers asked her
to clean it up, but she told them to mind their own business. That's
when it moved over to cyberspace and became even uglier.
Someone took photos of her and posted them on a popular Korean
blog. A blog, short for "Web log," is a running online commentary
about one's life or about the issues of the day. Another blogger,
Don Park, explains what happened next:
Within hours, she was labeled gae-ttong-nyue (dog shit girl) and her pictures
and parodies were everywhere. Within days, her identity and her past
were revealed. Requests for information about her parents and relatives
started popping up and people started to recognize her by the dog and the
bag she was carrying as well as her watch, clearly visible in the original picture.
All mentions of privacy invasion were shouted down.... The common
excuse for their behavior was that the girl doesn't deserve privacy.
Across the Internet, people made posters with the girl's photograph,
fusing her picture with a variety of other images. The dog poop girl
story quickly migrated to the mainstream media, becoming national news in
South Korea. As a result of her public shaming and embarrassment, the dog
poop girl dropped out of her university.
The story of the dog poop girl wasn't known in the United States until
Don Park wrote about it in his blog, Don Park's Daily Habit. It became even
more popular when the blog BoingBoing discussed the story. BoingBoing receives
nearly ten million visits per month-more than the circulations of
many newspapers and magazines. In no time, newspapers and websites
around the world were discussing the story.
The story of the dog poop girl raises a number of intriguing issues about
the Internet, privacy, norms, and life in the Information Age. Not picking up
your dog's poop is bad behavior in most people's books, but was the reaction
to her transgression appropriate? We all have probably engaged in rude behavior
or minor wrongdoing. But is it going too far to transform the dog poop
girl into a villain notorious across the globe?
The dog poop girl is just one example of a much larger phenomenon taking
place across the Internet. Increasingly, people are exposing personal information
about themselves and others online. We can now readily capture information
and images wherever we go, and we can then share them with the world
at the click of a mouse. Somebody you've never met can snap your photo and
post it on the Internet. Or somebody that you know very well can share your
cherished secrets with the entire planet. Your friends or coworkers might be
posting rumors about you on their blogs. The personal email you send to others
can readily be forwarded along throughout cyberspace, to be mocked and
laughed at far and wide. And your children might be posting intimate information
about themselves on the Web-or their friends or enemies might be
revealing your family secrets. These fragments of information won't fade away
with time, and they can readily be located by any curious individual. Like the
dog poop girl, you could find photos and information about yourself spreading
around the Internet like a virus.
This is a book about how the free flow of information on the Internet can
make us less free. We live in an age drenched in data, and the implications are
both wonderful and terrifying. The Internet places a seemingly endless library
in our homes; it allows us to communicate with others instantly; and it enables
us to spread information with an efficiency and power that humankind has
never before witnessed. The free flow of information on the Internet provides
wondrous new opportunities for people to express themselves and communicate.
But there's a dark side. As social reputation-shaping practices such as gossip
and shaming migrate to the Internet, they are being transformed in significant
ways. Information that was once scattered, forgettable, and localized is
becoming permanent and searchable. Ironically, the free flow of information
threatens to undermine our freedom in the future.
These transformations pose threats to people's control over their reputations
and their ability to be who they want to be. Will we enslave ourselves by
making it impossible to escape from the shackles of our past and from the
stain of gossip and false rumors? How much information should we know
about each other? How do we allow people to control their personal information
without curtailing free speech or stifling freedom on the Internet?
This book will take a journey through the ways in which private lives are
being exposed online, and it will examine the implications. People have profound
new ways to communicate, yet the gossip, shaming, and rumors that
are being spread online are sometimes having devastating effects on people's
lives. Should we do something to stop the exposure of private secrets on the
Internet? Can we do anything? In this book I will propose a framework for
how we can address these problems-by recognizing a new and broader notion
of privacy and by reaching a better balance between privacy and free
THE INTERNET AS A TEENAGER
About a decade ago, the Internet in its early days was greeted with a kind of
euphoria. Its potential seemed to be boundless, and people viewed it as a wondrous
zone of freedom. A few years later, the giddiness dimmed with foreboding.
Commentators began to point out that the Internet wasn't inherently
free-it could be transformed into a radically controlled and restricted world.
In 1999 the Internet law expert Lawrence Lessig declared in his famous book,
Code: "We will see that cyberspace does not guarantee its own freedom but instead
carries an extraordinary potential for control."
Today, the Internet is no longer in its infancy. Although developed long ago
by researchers, the Internet entered into popular usage in the mid-1990s. It is
now maturing into its second decade in mainstream culture-its teenage
years. The Internet indeed has proven to be a place of both rigid control and
This book focuses on the free dimensions of the Internet. The future of the
Internet involves not only the clash between freedom and control but also a
struggle within the heart of freedom itself. The more freedom people have to
spread information online, the more likely that people's private secrets will be
revealed in ways that can hinder their opportunities in the future. In many respects,
the teenage Internet is taking on all the qualities of an adolescent-brash,
uninhibited, unruly, fearless, experimental, and often not mindful of
the consequences of its behavior. And as with a teenager, the Net's greater
freedom can be both a blessing and a curse.
In the offline world, the dog poop girl would have been quickly forgotten.
The incident would have ended when she left the subway train. But the Internet
enabled the few witnesses of her transgression to express their outrage to
millions. Indeed, the Internet affords people unprecedented new ways to communicate
with others. It has blossomed into a fantastic world of free expression,
teeming with chatrooms, online discussion groups, and blogs, which are
proliferating at a breathtaking rate. Everyday people express themselves to a
worldwide audience, something never before possible in the history of humankind.
In May 2005 I became a blogger. Within an instant, I could publish virtual
op-eds to the entire world. Billions of people potentially could access my
thoughts. The blog I posted on was visited thousands of times a day. A lot of
people were reading. What made this so exciting was that I'd never had any
success getting an op-ed published. I had tried many a time, but the editors
just wouldn't give me a plot of valuable space on their pages. Suddenly I no
longer need them. I can get my thoughts out far and wide without their help.
Blogging brings instant gratification. I can quickly work up my thoughts
into a post and publish them to the website for the world to read. People then
post comments, and I can have a discussion with them. Blogging has allowed
me to explore many an idea that might have languished in a forgotten corner
of my mind. In fact, this book was inspired by my blog post about the dog
poop girl case.
Blogs are everywhere these days. There are blogs about virtually any topic
under the sun. Dogs and poop are both popular topics for blogs. A blog called
Doggie News gleefully reported the dog poop girl story. There's a blog purportedly
written by dogs called Blogdogs. There's even a blog about poop
called Poop Report. Needless to say, the dog poop girl story was a big scoop
for Poop Report.
It is hard not to get excited about these developments, to see the great freedom
and power that the Internet can provide to everyday people. But while
many bloggers talk about politics, books, music, dogs, or other topics, a large
number of bloggers enjoy speaking about their personal lives, their sexual experiences,
the people they know, and even the girl on the train who wouldn't
clean up after her dog. Details about many people's private lives are finding
their way onto the Internet, often without the subjects' knowledge and consent.
And in a number of cases, the consequences for these people are severe.
As people use the freedom-enhancing dimensions of the Internet, as they express
themselves and engage in self-development, they may be constraining
the freedom and self-development of others-and even of themselves.
THE NORM POLICE
In the dog poop girl case, people harnessed the power of the Internet to enforce
a norm-the obligation to clean up after one's dog. Norms are "social
attitudes of approval and disapproval," the law professor Cass Sunstein writes.
Norms specify "what ought to be done and what ought not to be done."
Norms bind societies together; they regulate everyday conduct; they foster civility.
They are the oil that reduces the friction of human interaction. We
need to maintain norms of courtesy so that we can all get along nicely. Imagine
if we didn't have norms like first-come, first-served. Fisticuffs would
quickly follow. In short, norms are a central mechanism through which a society
exercises social control.
To be effective, norms must be regularly followed. If people flout norms
and get away with it too often, norms can weaken and lose their influence over
behavior. When somebody butts in line, many people usually just grumble
under their teeth, but there are a few folks who confront that norm violator.
These "norm police" help enforce norms, and they are essential to ensuring
that norms remain strong.
The dog poop girl violated a norm that most people would agree with, but
were the norm police too harsh in punishing her? Most norm enforcement involves
angry scowls or just telling a person off. The blogosphere can be a
much more powerful norm-enforcing tool, allowing bloggers to act as a cyberposse,
tracking down norm violators and branding them with digital marks of
shame. Having a permanent record of norm violations is upping the sanction
to a whole new level.
Don Park's blog contains some interesting comments by his readers about
the dog poop girl. Some commentators were sympathetic to her plight,
likening the attacks on her to a "witch hunt." But others celebrated her shaming.
One theme is responsibility. In the words of one commentator:
Every once in a while, it's good for someone who is an ass to be shown as an ass.
Whether to a small group or large crowd. She needs to learn to be accountable,
whether in front of 5 people or 5,000,000 people. It's really all the same. Manners
Another commentator opined:
In the old days, people conformed to societal expectations and norms based on the
feedback they got from those around them. These days, especially in large urban areas
where anonymity prevails, most people seem to be afraid to criticize anyone for
anything. Maybe now technology will provide a way to reinstate that societal feedback.
I doubt this episode would have occurred in a small town where everyone
knows everyone and such actions would have resulted in immediate consequences.
Yet another remarked:
Lack of personal responsibility is the problem here. And it's really prevalent these
It is certainly true that the Internet better enabled people to hold the dog
poop girl responsible for her behavior. People who act inappropriately might
not be able to escape into obscurity anymore; instead, they may be captured in
pixels and plastered across the Internet. They'll be held responsible for their
actions. But perhaps responsibility cuts both ways. Shouldn't the cyberspace
norm police also have responsibilities? What if they get out of hand? What if
they wrongly accuse somebody? What if their shaming punishes a minor
transgression too much?
A common thread running through the comments about the dog poop girl is
that she should expect no privacy because she was in public. One commentator
The initial blogger. Do I think he had every right to post her? Yep. She was in public,
and it really doesn't matter if she was in front of 100 or 1,000,000 people, she
was willing to act that way in the public sphere.
Under existing notions, privacy is often thought of in a binary way-something
is either private or public. According to the general rule, if something
occurs in a public place, it is not private. But a more nuanced view of privacy
suggests that this case involved taking an event that occurred in one context
and significantly altering its nature-by making it permanent and widespread.
The dog poop girl would have been just a vague image in a few people's memories
if it hadn't been for the photo entering cyberspace and spreading around
faster than an epidemic. Despite the fact that the event occurred in public,
was there a need for her image and identity to be spread across the Internet?
Yet another commentator stated:
I really don't think it matters that it came out on the internet. It happened in a public
place so it is excusable to discuss it in a public forum. This isn't going to ruin her
life, it might make her clean up her dog's mess for a month though while the story
goes around. We are a fickle bunch and she will be forgotten before the end of the
But this comment is inaccurate. She will not be forgotten. That's what the
Internet changes. Whereas before the girl would have been remembered
merely by a few as just some woman who wouldn't clean up dog poop, now
her image and identity are eternally preserved in electrons. Forever, she will be
the "dog poop girl"; forever, she will be captured in Google's unforgiving
memory; and forever, she will be in the digital doghouse for being rude and
inconsiderate. The dog poop girl's behavior was certainly wrong, but we
might not know the whole story behind the incident to judge her appropriately.
And should people's social transgressions follow them on a digital rap
sheet that can never be expunged?
The easy reaction is to steel ourselves and chalk it up to life in the digital
age. But the stakes are too high for that. We perform an enormous range of activities
in public. Do we want to live with the risk that people can snap our
picture wherever we are and put it up on the Internet? We expose a litany of
personal information as we go about our daily lives. Do we want it to be permanently
posted online for the world to see? Consider the thoughts of another
commentator to Don Park's blog:
It reminds me of the struggles that editors face when deciding about what pictures
to run in the newspaper. Those editors need to make a judgement call based on the
value of the picture and its relevance to the story. But here, the person was outraged
and ran the picture of the girl. That's totally different. It shows the dangerous flip
side of citizen media. Moral outrage is easy to flame. But the consequences can be
mortal. Will the ease in inciting moral outrage create a mob driven police state? It
may be when the powerful realize how they can use citizen "reporters," to influence
mobs. That seems to be one of the real dangers of citizen journalism.
Excerpted from "The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet" by Prof. Daniel J. Solove. Copyright © 2007 by Prof. Daniel J. Solove. Excerpted by permission. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher. Excerpts are provided solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.